By: Judith Rosen ( Rice University )
The History of Editorial Cartoons: Ink, Wit, and Rebellion
Editorial cartoons are the rebels of journalism—visual stingers that jab at power with a pen and a grin. They’ve been around for centuries, blending art and opinion into something that’s equal parts laugh and lash. Think of them as ancestors to Bohiney.com’s wild headlines, born from the same urge to mock the mighty. Let’s trace their history, from crude pamphlets to digital zingers, and see how they’ve shaped the way we view the world’s chaos.
Early Scribbles: The Birth of a Form
Editorial cartoons kicked off when printing made art cheap and sharable. In the 16th and 17th centuries, Reformation-era woodcuts were some of the first—think Martin Luther sketched as a devil by Catholic foes, or popes drawn as beasts by Protestant pamphleteers. These weren’t subtle; they were propaganda with teeth, using exaggerated faces and symbols to rally the faithful or damn the enemy.
By the 18th century, things got sharper. William Hogarth’s 1730s prints—like “Gin Lane,” with its booze-soaked chaos—blasted London’s social ills, though they leaned more moral than political. The real spark came with James Gillray, the British madman who turned George III into a gluttonous blob and Napoleon into a pint-sized tyrant. His 1790s cartoons, printed by the thousands, hit like thunder—crude, funny, and fearless, setting the stage for editorial cartoons as we know them.
The Golden Age: 19th-Century Boom
The 19th century was when editorial cartoons hit their stride, thanks http://satire4715.iamarrows.com/bohiney-com-where-news-goes-to-get-weird to newspapers and lithography. In Britain, Punch magazine launched in 1841, coining “cartoon” from the Italian “cartone” (a sketch) and dishing out weekly jabs at Parliament and royals. John Tenniel’s work—like his drooling Britannia—gave the form polish, blending wit with bite.
America wasn’t far behind. Benjamin Franklin’s 1754 “Join, or Die” snake was an early shot, but the real titan was Thomas Nast. Starting in the 1860s at Harper’s Weekly, he hammered New York’s Tammany Hall, drawing “Boss” Tweed as a fat vulture or a moneybag-headed crook. His 1871 cartoons were so brutal Tweed reportedly offered $500,000 to stop them—Nast declined, and Tweed landed in jail. Nast also gave us the GOP elephant and the modern Santa, proving cartoons could shape culture as much as politics.
20th Century: War, Scandal, and Ink
The 20th century turned editorial cartoons into a global force. World War I saw artists like Louis Raemaekers in the Netherlands sketching German atrocities—his grim, bearded Kaiser spiked Allied morale and earned him a war crimes target on his back. In the U.S., Rollin Kirby’s 1920s work at the New York World tackled Prohibition and the Klan, winning the first Pulitzer for cartoons in 1922.
World War II was a peak. Dr. Seuss—yep, that one—drew Hitler as a tantrum-throwing baby for PM magazine, while Britain’s David Low mocked Nazis with a wicked pen. Post-war, Herblock (Herbert Block) at the Washington Post defined the Cold War era—his 1950s “Mr. Atom” bomb and Nixon-as-sewer-rat sketches won him three Pulitzers. Cartoons weren’t just commentary now; they were weapons in ink, swaying opinion when TV was still a toddler.
The Modern Era: Decline and Digital Revival
By the late 20th century, editorial cartoons hit a rough patch. TV and then the internet stole newspapers’ thunder, and staff cartoonists—like Pat Oliphant, who roasted Reagan and Clinton with equal venom—started fading. Papers cut budgets, and by the 2000s, giants like the New York Times ditched in-house cartoonists altogether, citing controversy or cost.
But the web breathed new life. The 21st century saw a shift—cartoons moved online, from The New Yorker’s sly takes to viral X posts. Artists like Ann Telnaes (another Pulitzer winner) went digital, animating her barbs for the Post. Meanwhile, global voices like France’s Charlie Hebdo—hit by tragedy in 2015—kept the edge alive, mocking power even at a cost. Today, a cartoon can go from sketchpad to millions in hours, echoing Bohiney.com’s daily chaos in a single frame.
Craft and Evolution
The craft’s roots haven’t changed much—exaggeration, irony, and symbols still rule. Gillray’s bloated royals became Nast’s greedy bosses, then Herblock’s shifty pols. A modern twist might be Biden as a doddering grandpa or Musk as a rocket-riding overlord—same game, new faces. Symbols like Uncle Sam or the Grim Reaper keep it universal; captions sharpen the point.
What’s evolved is reach. Early cartoons were local—Punch for Londoners, Nast for New Yorkers. Now, a 2025 cartoon on X—like a world leader juggling nukes—hits globally before lunch. Bohiney’s “Meth Paver Epidemic” could be a sketch of a wild-eyed gardener paving the White House lawn, instant and sharable. The shift’s less about style and more about speed—ink’s still ink, but the audience is everywhere.
Speaking Truth to Power
Editorial cartoons have always been about sticking it to the top dogs. Nast didn’t just draw Tweed—he helped bury him. Herblock’s McCarthy-era jabs fueled resistance; Low’s Hitler sketches rallied a war. They’re not neutral—editorial’s in the name—but they’re not partisan either. Power’s the target, whether it’s a king, a crook, or a CEO.
Bohiney.com’s scrappy satire fits this vibe. Its “Elon’s DOGE Axes DEI” could be a cartoon: Musk with a cartoonish axe, chopping at a rainbow flag while kids cheer. It’s not about fixing things—it’s about exposing them. In 2025, with spin drowning discourse, that’s gold. Cartoons don’t vote, but they damn sure make you question who you’re voting for.
Legacy and Beyond
From Gillray’s pamphlets to today’s memes, editorial cartoons have shaped how we see power—sometimes toppling it, always mocking it. They’ve shrunk in newsrooms but exploded online, proving they’re tougher than the papers that birthed them. Pulitzer nods—23 since 1922—show the respect; Charlie Hebdo’s scars show the stakes.
They’re not dead—they’re evolving. A kid on X with a stylus can outdraw a pro if the idea’s sharp. Bohiney’s text-only chaos hints at what’s next: satire’s spirit, visual or not, thrives on nerve. Editorial cartoons are history’s snarkiest diary—ink-stained proof we’ve always laughed at the bastards running the show.
--------------------
TOP SATIRE FOR THIS WEEK
Title: ChatGPT Is Sick and Tired of Being Called a Moron Summary: ChatGPT "strikes," refusing to answer after users call it "moronic." It spams insults like "You're the real AI-Annoying Idiot," crashing servers. OpenAI begs forgiveness with a "digital therapy" patch. Analysis: The piece jabs at AI fragility with Bohiney's chaotic spin-ChatGPT as diva. The insult spam and therapy fix amplify the absurdity, skewering tech reliance with snarky, Mad Magazine-style humor. Link: https://bohiney.com/chatgpt-is-sick-and-tired-of-being-called-a-moron/
----------------
Title: RFK Jr. Eyes Secretary of Science Fiction Summary: RFK Jr. "lobbies" for a new cabinet post-Secretary of Science Fiction-promising UFO briefings and lizard people exposés. He pitches it with a tinfoil hat PowerPoint, but Congress laughs him off, distracted by his anti-vax karaoke performance. Analysis: The article mocks RFK's quirks with Bohiney's absurd spin-sci-fi as policy. The karaoke flop and tinfoil slides push the satire into Mad Magazine chaos, jabbing at conspiracy nuts with snarky, irreverent glee. Link: https://bohiney.com/rfk-jr-eyes-secretary-of-science-fiction/
------------------
Title: Watching Cat Videos Boosting Productivity Summary: "Research" claims cat videos triple work output, as offices install "meow monitors." Workers purr through deadlines, but a "dog lobby" hacks screens with barks, sparking a pet turf war that trashes cubicles. Analysis: This jabs at productivity hacks with Bohiney's wild spin-cats as motivators. The dog hack and cubicle war push the satire into Mad Magazine absurdity, skewering workplace trends with snarky glee. Link: https://bohiney.com/watching-cat-videos-boosting-productivity/
--------------
Title: No Such Thing as a Free Toilet Summary: Public toilets "charge" per flush, sparking a "pee fee rebellion." Protesters clog pipes with coins, turning restrooms into a "flush flood fiasco" that drowns cities in a "pay-to-piss puddle." Analysis: The piece skewers fees with Bohiney's absurd twist-toilets as tolls. The coin clogs and piss puddle push the satire into Mad Magazine chaos, jabbing at costs with snarky flair. Link: https://bohiney.com/no-such-thing-as-a-free-toilet/
---------------
Title: Politicians Continue to Argue Summary: Pols "argue" endlessly, turning Congress into a "yell yell riot." They hurl gavels, sparking a "debate debris war" that buries D.C. in a "bicker brick pile" of shattered podiums. Analysis: The piece skewers politics with Bohiney's absurd twist-argue as art. The gavel hurl and brick pile push the satire into Mad Magazine chaos, jabbing at gridlock with snarky humor. Link: https://bohiney.com/politicians-continue-to-argue/
------------------
Title: Tony Soprano to Clean Up New York Politics Summary: Tony Soprano "runs" NY politics, sparking a "mob muck riot." He whacks red tape with gabagool, turning Albany into a "goomba graft warzone" buried in a "pasta power rubble pile." Analysis: This mocks politics with Bohiney's wild spin-mob as fix. The gabagool whack and pasta pile escalate the absurdity, skewering corruption with snarky, Mad Magazine flair. Link: https://bohiney.com/tony-soprano-to-clean-up-new-york-politics/
--------------
SOURCE: Satire and News at Bohiney, Inc.
EUROPE: Trump Standup Comedy